Saturday, October 10, 2009

Telomerase and Wnt signaling

Now that research into telomeres and telomerase has (finally) garnered a Nobel Prize, it's a good time to write about recent research on the subject.

Seminal work on telomeres by Elizabeth Blackburn, one of the Nobel winners, was published way back in 1978, and active studies have been going on ever since. So perhaps it's not surprising that the rate of new findings is not so rapid as occurs in newer areas – such as stem cells.

But fascinating new results on telomeres and telomerase do still appear, and one of them connects with more recent research areas – such as Wnt signaling and... stem cells.

Here's the press release:

Discovery pinpoints new connection between cancer cells, stem cells (7/1/09)
A molecule called telomerase, best known for enabling unlimited cell division of stem cells and cancer cells, has a surprising additional role in the expression of genes in an important stem cell regulatory pathway, say researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine. The unexpected finding may lead to new anticancer therapies and a greater understanding of how adult and embryonic stem cells divide and specialize.

Don't bother getting excited about the "new anticancer therapies" bit. That's just boilerplate that about 77.3% of all press releases dealing with cell biology contain, presumably to impress the rubes. If you need something to get excited about, you might recall that telomerase is also being investigated intensively in connection with issues of aging and longevity, independently from cancer. However, while it's possible that something of medical significance may come from this research, that's probably way down the road.

Before discussing the new research, let's review some of the background on telomeres, telomerase, and Wnt signaling.

To begin with, a telomere is a series of short repeated segments of DNA found at the ends of chromosomes in all eukaryotic cells. In cells of vertebrate animals the repeated segment is TTAGGG (where the letters represent nucleobases: T=thymine, A=adenine, G=guanine).

The total number of nucleotides in these repeated segments varies a great deal from species to species, but in humans it is (initially) about 10,000 nucleotides (or ~1700 complete segments). I say "initially", because part of the telomere is lost every time a cell divides – perhaps 50 to 200 nucleotides per division. Obviously, this means that an adult cell newly derived from a stem cell can divide at most 50-200 times before the telomere is all gone. In practice, the number is a lot less than the maximum, perhaps 40 to 60 times, which is called the Hayflick limit. Cells are programmed to stop dividing on reaching this limit, since otherwise useful DNA would be lost or damaged upon further division.

Why does this loss occur? It seems to be somewhat of an accident of the nitty-gritty details of how DNA replication occurs during cell division. I won't go into that, since it's best explained with some diagrams; you can read about it at Wikipedia. In fact, in the early days of molecular biology (around 1972), what happens at the end of chromosomes during DNA replication was rather puzzling, and the puzzle was called the "end replication problem". Now it's pretty well understood, though somewhat messy.

In any case, the loss of DNA from the telomeres during cell division is a fact, and it conveniently explains the existence of the Hayflick limit, which had been recognized since 1965. What happens when the teleomere is all used up and the limit is reached? Cells that have reached the limit don't necessarily die (though they might), but they do stop dividing, and they enter a static phase of cell life known as senescence.

If you think about it, senescence can be a problem, especially in certain tissues that need to continually replenish their cells, such as skin and the lining of the intestines, as well as hair, fingernails, etc. How is senescence circumvented in such tissues? The answer is (adult) stem cells. It turns out that stem cells are not subject to the Hayflick limit. It's not clear whether they are subject to limits at all.

Like any other cell type, stem cells also divide (by the process technically known as mitosis). But there is one difference from the way "ordinary" cells divide. Stem cells can divide asymmetrically, where one daughter cell is another stem cell, but the other daughter is a "progenitor cell", which is close to a normal, fully-differentiated adult cell of a fixed tissue type. Progenitor cells differentiate further into the final form when they divide, and they are able to divide only a limited number of times.

So how is it that stem cells are able to escape the Hayflick limit, dividing an indefinite number of times, even though they are also subject to the same loss of telomere nucleotides with each division? The answer is the enzyme telomerase, which is able to rebuild shortened teleomeres. It's fortunate for the longevity of complex organisms that telomerase exists, otherwise stem cells would not be able to divide often enough to allow tissues exposed to harsh conditions (such as skin and intestinal lining) to be replenished.

In order to explain the results of the research to be described here we need to say more about telomerase, but first let's summarize the function of telomeres. At first it may seem that all they do is compensate for the sloppy way that DNA replication works, by providing long stretches of expendable DNA at the ends of chromosomes. But there is one other notable function: teleomeres are a useful "cap" at the end of a chromosome that is recognizable to cellular mechanisms responsible for detecting DNA damage. If it weren't for the telomeres, the ends of chromosomes would be indistinguishable from DNA damage, which can result from errors in the replication process, as well as damage due to external agents such as ionizing radiation or harmful chemicals. Cells have various mechanisms for repairing many kinds of damage, but even if repair isn't possible, other mechanisms exist that recognize the damage and prevent further cell division or cause programmed cell death (apoptosis).

Not all DNA damage can be repaired or compensated for by apoptosis or cessation of cell division. Unrepaired DNA damage (however it occurs) is the main cause of cancer (though not the only one). So the existence of the Hayflick limit as a result of teleomere shortening acts as one defense against cancer. Cancer can be defined as the uncontrolled proliferation of cells as a result of DNA damage (affecting existing mechanisms that normally control proliferation) or other causes. So fixed limits on the number of times a cell can divide is one of a number of mechanisms organisms have to guard against cancer.

Before moving on, here's a quick summary of the functions served by telomeres: (1) compensate for the chromosome "end replication problem"; (2) make it possible for cells to distinguish chromosome ends from damaged chromosomes; (3) provide natural limits to the number of times ordinary cells can divide, as protection against cancer.

As noted above, the third of these functions is a problem for stem cells that do need the ability to divide an indefinite number of times. Repair of tissues exposed to harsh conditions is not the only circumstance this ability is needed. Another very important case is that of embryonic development. Multicellular, sexually-reproducing organisms start from a single cell (zygote). Yet there are close to 1014 cells in an adult human.

It is true that a single cell that underwent 47 cycles of cell division could theoretically produce that many cells. But that's really pushing the limits, since some cell types are needed in much larger numbers than others. The bottom line is that embryonic development is the other main circumstance when limits on cell division need to be overcome.

Telomerase is what makes this overcoming of telomere limits possible. And it does it in a pretty straightforward way. Telomerase is a complex molecule with three distinct parts. Two of these are proteins: Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) and dyskernin, which are coded for by distinct genes. TERT does most of the work. The other part is a short piece of RNA, called the telomerase RNA component (TERC), which contains and is somewhat longer than the repeat unit (TTAGGG in vertebrates). Like any other reverse transcriptase enzyme (other examples of which occur in RNA viruses such as HIV), TERT simply translates a piece of RNA into DNA and inserts it into a chromosome. In the case of telomerase, the RNA is carried inside the enzyme complex itself. Telomerase does its job simply by replacing the telomere DNA that is lost from chromosomes during mitosis.

So telomerase performs the function of rebuilding telomeres, and this is essential in tissues where cells must proliferate rapidly, such as in embryonic development and tissue regeneration. But as we noted above, if the restriction on cell division is circumvented, the risk of cancer goes up. Although telomerase serves an essential purpose in specialized contexts, it also makes it possible for cells to become cancerous. Consequently, telomerase is not expressed in most adult body cells. However, telomerase is expressed in about 90% of tumor cells.

It might seem as though one approach to controlling or even destroying cancer could involve either inhibiting telomerase or developing a vaccine using telomerase to induce an immune response against telomerase-rich cancer cells. There are in fact various clinical trials exploring both techniques. But this is tricky and rather risky, because as we've observed, telomerase is needed in stem cells required for tissue regneration, at least once the cells have begun proliferating. Those cells need to be protected while they are simply doing their job – replenishing skin and intestinal linings, for example. We need to understand how such cells are controlled so that they work without leading to cancer.

Anyhow, TERT is a protein that is an essential component of telomerase, which plays an important role in cell proliferation. The new research we're finally almost ready to discuss shows that, surprisingly, TERT also plays a role in a completely different aspect of cell proliferation having nothing to do with telomeres. That's where Wnt signaling comes in.

Wnt signaling is a subject we've looked at several times before. Some of the relevant articles are here, here, here, and here. Wnt was first noticed in connection with embryonic development and tissue regeneration. This article has many examples. The name Wnt alludes to a gene called "wingless", because the gene causes fruit flies to lack wings when the gene is mutated.

Recently Wnt's importance in stem cells has also received a lot of attention. Some of our discussion of that may be found here, here, here, and here. Wnt's relevance to cancer and cancer stem cells is often touched on in most of all the articles listed.

Basically, Wnt is the name of a family of proteins that play an important role in signals promoting cell proliferation, especially in the context of embryonic development and tissue renewal (skin, intestines, hair, and immune system cells). Since Wnt proteins promote proliferation, they also play a role in cancer.

The fact, then, that new research shows teleomerase can enhance Wnt signaling is signficant as a second, entirely separate route through which it plays a role in both normal stem cell function and cancer.

Here's the research abstract:

Telomerase modulates Wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin (7/2/09)
Stem cells are controlled, in part, by genetic pathways frequently dysregulated during human tumorigenesis. Either stimulation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling or overexpression of telomerase is sufficient to activate quiescent epidermal stem cells in vivo, although the mechanisms by which telomerase exerts these effects are not understood. Here we show that telomerase directly modulates Wnt/β-catenin signalling by serving as a cofactor in a β-catenin transcriptional complex. The telomerase protein component TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) interacts with BRG1 (also called SMARCA4), a SWI/SNF-related chromatin remodelling protein, and activates Wnt-dependent reporters in cultured cells and in vivo. TERT serves an essential role in formation of the anterior–posterior axis in Xenopus laevis embryos, and this defect in Wnt signalling manifests as homeotic transformations in the vertebrae of Tert-/- mice. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of the endogenous TERT protein from mouse gastrointestinal tract shows that TERT physically occupies gene promoters of Wnt-dependent genes. These data reveal an unanticipated role for telomerase as a transcriptional modulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway.

That's a pretty good summary of the paper, but I imagine most people would like a bit more explanation of what's going on.

Previous research had disclosed some interesting "coincidences" involving stems cells and embryonic development, in which both telomerase and Wnt signaling seemed to have similar effects, even though no obvious connection was known. For example, epidermal (skin) stem cells spend most of their time in a quiescent (non-dividing) state. The main function of Wnt proteins is to carry signals between cells that inform target cells of a need to start dividing, for example during various stages of embryonic development or to heal wounds. The curious thing is that telomerase was known to have a similar effect as Wnt signaling on some stem cells. This coincidence is enough to motivate looking for a connection.

If you are really into this sort of thing, you might want to refer to this diagram of various cell signaling pathways, including that of Wnt. One of the things it illustrates is the position of β-catenin in the Wnt pathway. β-catenin operates at the end of the pathway, where it becomes a part of a protein complex that includes transcription factors (known as TCF/LEF), and the complex causes expression of a variety of Wnt-regulated genes, which go on to enable cell proliferation.

One of the main findings of the research is that TERT interacts with another protein called BRG1 (or SMARCA4), and together these become important parts ("cofactors") of the gene-regulating protein complex. It was also determined that TERT is the only component of telomerase that is involved with Wnt signaling.

Apparently TERT is more important for some instances of Wnt signaling than for others. For example, low levels of TERT in embryos of the frog Xenopus laevis resulted in very abnormal development of the frog embryos (in terms for the anterior-posterior axis of the body). But low levels of TERT at a later stage of development caused only somewhat more subtle defects in formation of ribs in the embryo. Similar somewhat minor effects also occured with low levels of TERT in mouse embryos, and these defects were much like the effects of low levels of β-catenin.

So what, then, is so interesting about this research? It's satisfying to know the reasons for what were previously just observed coincidences, such as the fact that telomerase is not only very important for the ability of stem cells to divide freely (during embryonic development and tissue regeneration) but that it also can help stimulate stem cell division.

But what makes this research especially significant is the importance of the biological processes in which both telomerase and Wnt signaling play major roles – namely embryonic development, tissue regeneration and repair, and cancer. The latter two processes are especially important for medical reasons, although we're still a long way from being able to use this knowledge about telomerase and Wnt signaling for therapeutic purposes.

As far as cancer is concerned, we need to understand much more about how telomerase and Wnt signaling work in various types of stem cells, given that stem cells may play a big role in some types of cancer (though not in others).

But tissue regeneration and repair are also of significant medical interest, since it is the eventual inability of various types of tissues to replenish themselves in old age that is responsible for the many debilities that appear in old age. Many people have speculated that telomerase could help alleviate this problem – provided it does not also lead to facilitating the development of cancer.

Finally, we are left with the puzzle of how it is that TERT happens to play important – yet quite distinct – roles in two very separate processes that are, neverthelesss, both important for cell proliferation. We don't know the answer to this, but we can speculate. Perhaps it's because TERT has to be around anyway for stem cells during embryogenesis and tissue regeneration. That being the case, perhaps at some point in evolution, TERT also happened to help boost Wnt signaling a little. The effect of amplifying Wnt signaling in the same contexts that telomerase was needed would be advantageous and worth conserving. This kind of double duty should lead to more efficient use of cell resources.



ResearchBlogging.org
Park, J., Venteicher, A., Hong, J., Choi, J., Jun, S., Shkreli, M., Chang, W., Meng, Z., Cheung, P., Ji, H., McLaughlin, M., Veenstra, T., Nusse, R., McCrea, P., & Artandi, S. (2009). Telomerase modulates Wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin Nature, 460 (7251), 66-72 DOI: 10.1038/nature08137


Further reading:

Cell biology: The not-so-odd couple (7/2/09) – expository article in Nature about the telomerase-Wnt research

Nobel in medicine honors discoveries of telomeres and telomerase (10/5/09) – news article in Science News

Nobel for insights into ageing and cancer (10/5/09) – news article in New Scientist

Chromosome protection scoops Nobel (10/5/09) – news article in Nature

Three Americans Win Physiology or Medicine Nobel (10/5/09) – news article at ScienceNOW.com

Work on Telomeres Wins Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for 3 U.S. Genetic Researchers (10/5/09) – news article in Scientific American

Nobel Winners Isolate Protein Behind Immortality, Cancer (10/5/09) – news article at Wired.com

Tags:

, ,

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

BDNF and depression

Back in March I wrote a little bit about the convoluted relationships among stress, learning, and memory (here). About the same time, I wrote about the relationship between memory and an important neural growth factor, BDNF (here).

It seems that BDNF is an important bridge connecting the topics of memory, stress, and depression. Back in March I also started to write more about how BDNF is linked to depression, but I got sidetracked. So the rest of this message is what I started to write about that connection, which is why the research covered is from March or earlier.

But before turning to that, it should be noted that there is more to say about the relationship between BDNF and stress, which I'll put off a little longer. There's also more to say about the relationship between BDNF and antidepressant drugs, some of which is more recent than March. I'll put that off too.

So let's just get into the older stuff about BDNF and depression, to start the ball rolling again.

Research has shown that one way in which BDNF is linked to depression is through the neurotransmitter serotonin – whose connection to mood, depression, anxiety, etc. is pretty well known (think Prozac).

In particular, BDNF seems to affect expression of the gene for the serotonin transporter (SERT). (The gene itself is called SLC6A4, which stands for "solute carrier family 6, member 4".) SERT is a cell membrane protein that transports serotonin from the synapse between neurons back into the neuron from whence it came – enabling "serotonin reuptake". Some forms of the gene for SERT seem to predispose individuals who carry it to mood disorder.

Here are some reports of recent research on BDNF, which give an idea of the variety of effects it has within the nervous system. (The summaries included here are mine.)


The yin and yang of genes for mood disorders (3/12/08)
This research studied conditions under which a variant of the gene for SERT (i. e. SLC6A4) predisposes the carrier to mood disorders. Apparently there are also at least two variants of the gene for BDNF. An individual with one form of BDNF is particularly susceptible to the deleterious form of the SERT gene, but with the other form of BDNF, an individual is completely protected against it.

Brain Chemistry Ties Anxiety And Alcoholism (3/4/08)
Production of BDNF is known to be stimulated by exposure to alcohol. The researchers in this study, whose leader author is Subhash Pandey, also knew from previous experiments that reduced levels of BDNF in the amygdalas of normal laboratory rats led to increased anxiety in the rats, followed by increased consumption of alcohol. The question was what happened due to deficiency of BDNF that increased anxiety, and how did consumption of alcohol reverse this effect by restoring BDNF.

It is also known that BDNF stimulate the production of another protein, Arc. If Arc could be suppressed in the amygdala even in the presence of normal levels of BDNF, and the rats experienced increased anxiety anyhow, this would show that it is probably a deficiency of Arc rather than of BDNF that is responsible for the anxiety. And indeed, when Arc was suppressed in spite or normal BDNF, the rats had higher anxiety. They also consumed more alcohol. But when Arc levels returned to normal, the anxiety returned to normal, and alcohol consumption did too.

The question then came down to how a deficiency of Arc increased anxiety. It was found that temporarily reduced levels of Arc resulted in reduced numbers of dendritic spines of neurons in the amygdala. Since axons of other neurons form synapses with dendritic spines, there will be fewer synapses when there are fewer spines. At the same time, anxiety also increased. Conversely, when levels of Arc returned to normal, either naturally or as a result of higher levels of BDNF due to alcohol consumption, the number of spines increased, and anxiety decreased. Once Arc had increased normally, alcohol consumption decreased too.

Earlier results: Brain Chemical Plays Critical Role In Drinking And Anxiety (8/8/06) – when expression of BDNF (which is regulated by CREB) is blocked, anxiety and alcohol consumption in rats increases.


Tags: , ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Cancer, metabolism, and oncogenes

I want to call attention (somewhat belatedly) to a series of three very good tutorial blog posts at The Daily Transcript. Although they are nominally about changing views regarding cancer and its causes, they actually provide a nice overview of a number of important topics in molecular biology. Reading these posts will be a big help in understanding a lot of things written about here, in particular topics such as:

  • cancer, and how it is "caused" by various factors like metabolism and genetic mutations, and indirectly affected by other biological systems like the immune system
  • metabolism in general, and how problems with metabolism lead to disease conditions like diabetes and metabolic syndrome, perhaps even Alzheimer's disease
  • calorie restriction, and how it seems to play a role in longevity
  • stem cells – what makes them special, how they function biologically and may play a role in the process of cancer
  • important processes in cell biology, such as apoptosis, autophagy, and (of course) the cell cycle itself
  • general topics in molecular biology, such as growth factors, transcription factors, signaling cascades, and cell surface receptors

So here are the links, with a brief summary of each:

From Metabolism to Oncogenes and Back - Part I (3/17/08)
Historical introduction to the subject. Explains how Otto Warbug had the idea, 100 years ago, that the way to understand cancer was through metabolism. Somewhat later, the discovery of the Rous Sarcoma Virus (1916), and much later, after the revolutionary understanding of DNA and modern molecular biology came about, the focus shifted to the role of oncogenes, tumor suppressors, and genetic mutations in cancer.

From Metabolism to Oncogenes and Back - Part II (3/21/08)
More detailed look at the molecular biology of cancer, protein signaling pathways in general, and TOR signaling in particular. This part includes a great diagram of some of the more important signaling pathways as far as metabolism and cancer are concerned. Besides TOR, it clearly emphasizes the importance of the MAP kinase Ras, and the phosphoinositide signaling proteins PI3K, PTEN, and AKT.

From Metabolism to Oncogenes and Back - Part III (4/2/08)
An even more technical summary of recent discoveries about metabolism, and the peculiar kind of metabolic activity found in cancer cells. It appears that a type of enzyme called pyruvate kinase, which occurs in various forms, plays a big role in cell metabolism and whether a cell uses available energy for making sugars, fats, or DNA.


Tags: ,

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, July 01, 2007

How cells can cheat death

To begin with, we have to point out that for a cell to cheat death is usually not a good thing. The reason is that cell death is usually the result of a process called apoptosis, and this process has been carefully developed (by evolution) to dispose of cells that have become "sick" because of infection (by a virus) or damage that can occur to the cell's DNA in a variety of ways. Your body needs healthy cells to function, not sick ones. Especially it does not need cells with damaged DNA, which may well become cancerous.

Apoptosis is needed in other contexts as well. In a developing embryo apoptosis is needed to remove unnecessary tissue. In addition, failure of apoptosis can lead to autoimmune diseases as well as cancer. (This is why some anti-cancer drugs are also able to treat some autoimmune diseases.)

The following research announcement, which we'll look at in more detail, has a nice capsule summary of apoptosis.

Cells Re-energize To Come Back From The Brink Of Death
Apoptosis is triggered by a variety of factors, including gene mutations that can make the cell become cancerous. During apoptosis, the membrane covering the cell's mitochondria develop holes and leak a molecule called cytochrome c, which triggers the activity of enzymes called caspases. In turn, caspases trigger a series of events that kills the cell.

To amplify a little, here are some of the conditions that can initiate a cell's apoptosis program:

  • P53 protein may detect damaged DNA during the G1 phase of the cell division cycle. If it does not prove possible to repair the damaged DNA, P53 can invoke apoptosis.
  • The cytokine TNF (tumor necrosis factor) produced by the immune system (specifically, activated macrophages) is an external signal to initiate apoptosis. As the name implies, this is another anti-cancer mechanism.
  • Signals produced by cytotoxic T cells of the immune system can also induce apoptosis. This may occur in response to a virus-infected cell. (Much more on T cells: here.)

However, there is a weak spot in the apoposis process: it requires the presence of caspase enzymes. If something has blocked production of essential caspases (which some tumors are able to do), then apoptosis won't work.

Because of this, nature (i. e. evolution) has provided a backup mechanism for programmed cell death, one that does not rely on caspases. The mechanism is called, appropriately, caspase-independent cell death (CICD), and the research announcement mentioned above has this to say about it:
The process by which the membranes develop holes--mitochondrial outer membrane permeability (MOMP)--is often the "point of no return" for self-destruction, said Douglas Green, Ph.D., chair of the St. Jude Immunology department and the study's senior author. MOMP triggers apoptosis, but if apoptosis fails because there is no caspase available, the backup program called caspase-independent cell death (CICD) takes over the process.

Previous research has shown that cells that become cancerous lack caspase and other proteins needed to support apoptosis after MOMP releases cytochrome c. But this victory over death is short-lived if CICD is activated.

Unfortunately, tumors (successful ones anyway) eventually develop the ability to cheat this death program as well:
However, some cancerous cells not only dodge death from apoptosis by eliminating caspase activation, but they also foil CIDC. "Our study sought to understand how a cancer cell without caspase activation bypasses CICD as well," Green said.

The St. Jude team discovered that a cell that lacks caspase activation and cannot undergo apoptosis increases the levels of an enzyme called GAPDH in order to counteract CICD. GAPDH appears to prevent CICD by supporting the functioning of the mitochondria and triggering the activity of certain genes that prevent or repair cell damage. The findings also suggest that the increase in GAPDH provides energy to increase autophagy--the process by which a cell "chews up" debris and broken components, such as damaged mitochondria. After disposing of damaged mitochondria the cell can replace these vital components.

"We found that in the absence of caspase activation, cells that avoided CICD took about a week or so to begin multiplying again," Green said. "This might represent the time it takes for the cell to restore enough mitochondria to allow the cell to function normally."

Cancer cells are (unfortunately) amazing in their resourcefulness. Of course, this results from a kind of evolutionary process, in which cancer cells that are successful at cheating death and reproducing are those which have developed, by chance, the necessary mutations.

The role played by mitochondria and caspases in apoptosis is quite important for an understanding of both cancer and autoimmune diseases. It's worth remembering the connection, since further research will certainly tell us a lot more about these interrelated processes. Here's an example of earlier research on the subject: Proteins are Key to Cell Death in Heart Disease, Stroke and Degenerative Conditions

Tags: , , ,

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Reversing the cell division cycle

Most eukaryotic cells are "diploid", which means that each cell contains two copies of most of the chromosomes in the total genome (excepting the sex chromosomes, which in mammals are known as X and Y). The two copies of each chromosome are not entirely identical, though each contains the same genes. The difference is due to isolated variations that may occur within genes or outside genes in the non-coding "junk" DNA of a chromosome.

Humans, for example, have 22 paired chromosomes (besides the sex chromosomes). Both chromosomes in each pair have the same genes, but slight differences exist since in each pair is an almost exact copy of one chromosome from each of the parents. (The copies are not quite exact, due to mutations that may have occurred since the paternal sperm fertilized the maternal egg.)

It is important that every daughter cell that results from cell division continues to have both variants of each chromosome. This guarantees that every cell in the body continues to have the same genome, in which every gene is represented by a copy from each parent. For example, if 1 and 1* designate the two copies of chromosome number 1, then both daughter cells should have a 1 and a 1*, rather than two 1s in one daughter and two 1*s in the other.

Of course, this only applies to organisms (usually multicellular) which undergo sexual reproduction involving the fusion of an egg and a sperm. Cells of such an organism are "eukaryotic", which means that they have a nucleus and a genome consisting of several chromosomes which have a fairly elaborate internal structure.

It should not come as a surprise that the process of cell division required in order to keep all the genetic information straight is fairly complex. The overall cell division process is referred to as the "cell cycle". Sometimes the whole process is referred to loosely as "mitosis", but cell biologists normally reserve that term for the final phase of the cycle, in which all parts of the dividing cell are apportioned between each of the new daughter cells.

There are three other phases of the cycle before mitosis. Omitting most of the details, all that needs to be said is that it is in the second phase when the DNA making up the chromosomes is actually duplicated. This is a fascinating process in itself, but not relevant here. All you need to know is that after the DNA has been duplicated, each and every chromosome consists of two identical copies (unless an undetected copying error occurred). These duplicate copies are joined together at a point in the middle called a "centromere", and each copy in the pair is called a "chromatid". So at this point, there are actually four copies of each chromosome type (other than sex chromosomes) -- two copies from each of the organism's parents.

Later, in the mitosis phase, each pair of chromatids will be separated in such a way that each daughter cell inherits half of every pair of (identical) chromatids. All the complexity of the process lies in the mechanics of how this is accomplished. Basically, what happens is that all the chromatid pairs migrate to a plane roughly in the middle of the cell. At the same time, two spots known as "centrosomes" form on the cell membrane on opposite sides of the central plane. From each centrosome a network of threadlike "microtubules" is constructed. Eventually, every chromatid is attached to just one of the two centrosomes by a sort of loosely woven rope of microtubules. Once all of this is in place, the connection is severed between chromatids in each pair, and every chromatid begins to "climb" up its connection towards the centrosome it's attached to. Finally, the central part of the cell contracts, new nuclear envelopes form around the chromatids in each half, and at the end the two halves separate. And then the cycle begins again in its initial phase.

Given all this complexity -- most of whose details have been omitted -- I found it quite interesting, and surprising, that new research indicates this whole process can be reversed! This doesn't seem to happen naturally, as far as we know, but it can be made to happen by manipulating some of the proteins (known as "cyclins" and "kinases") that regulate the cell cycle.

Here's the press release that announces the pubication in Nature of the research: Rewind, please: OMRF scientist reverses process of cell division. Unfortunately, the press release itself is really lame. It explains almost nothing about the actual research -- so if one is at all curious about what is actually meant by "reversing" the cell division process, one is quite disappointed.

The research article itself, whose lead author is Gary Gorbsky of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, can be found here. Unfortunately, unless you have a subscription to Nature (or are willing to pay $30 for the privilege of having one week's access to the article), you won't be allowed to see it. But at least you can view the abstract here.

Even that won't be too helpful unless you're really up on your cell biology. So I'll try to explain in something a bit closer to English what the research is actually about.

As noted above, the transition between phases of the cell cycle is regulated by proteins called "cyclins" and "kinases". Within each phase, the appropriate genes get switched on to bring about whatever activity is to occur in that phase. In particular, the mitosis phase is kicked off by the appearance of a "cyclin-dependent kinase" called Cdk1 along with a cyclin molecule called, simply, cyclin B. Cdk1 is an enzyme that catalyzes the attachment of phosphate groups to other molecules. But it's active only when it has a cyclin attached, in this case cyclin B.

The cyclin molecules are not as robust as the kinases, which is a good thing, because it is their eventual breakdown, after all the work is done, that deactivates the kinase and allows a new phase of the cycle to commence.

What the research found is this: After the mitosis phase has ended ("mitotic exit"), but before the two new cells actually separate, the process can be returned to the middle of the mitotic phase by manipulating Cdk1 and cyclin B. What you do is block the degradation of cyclin B but use an inhibitor to disable Cdk1. Mitotic exit still occurs. But if you quickly remove the Cdk1 inhibitor, the process reverses. The membrane between the new cells reopens, the new nuclear envelopes break down, the microtubules reappear, and the chromosomes move back to the middle of the cell. Got that? The bottom line is that the degradation process of cyclin B provides directionality for the later part of the mitosis phase.

Well, all in all, it's a really fascinating bit of bio-hacking. Is this somehow, you know, useful in any way? Well, at least it's very interesting new knowledge about how fundamental cellular processes work. If we learn how to control the processes, we may figure out how to intervene in disease conditions when cells malfunction -- as in cancer, for instance. After all, cancer involves runaway cell division. If you can reverse the whole division process -- selectively, where it should not be happening -- you may have just found a cure for cancer.

------------------------
See also:
Gary Gorbsky home page
Gorsky Lab Home Page
Cell division rewinds
------------------------

Tags: , ,

Labels: